Re: [PATCH v2] virsh-edit: Make force editing usable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/19/2015 02:26 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
> On 02/19/2015 11:24 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> When editing a domain with 'virsh edit' and failing validation, the
>> usual message pops up:
>>
>>   Failed. Try again? [y,n,f,?]:
>>
>> Turning of validation can be ussable, mainly for testing (but other
> s/of/off
> s/ussable/useful
>
>> purposes too), so this patch adds support for relaxing definition in
>> virsh-edit and makes 'virsh edit <domain>' more usable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v2:
>>  - make a special case 'v' for turning off validation
> Another choice 'i' "ignore validation" - only because when I see -v I
> think "verbose" or "version" (just like -h is help)

I think I like "i" for "ignore validation errors" rather than "v", for
exactly the same reason - v almost always means "verbose" or "version".


--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]