On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:21:35PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:27:03AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 02:19:06PM +0100, Guido G?nther wrote: > > > > > > > > by honoring the VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE flag. > > > > > > > O.k. to commit this part as a start so you can readily use it vor lxc? > > > > > > > > > > > > ACK, assuming 'make check' still passes. > > > > > It does here, sure. Patch Applied now. I've added the flag to the > > > > > functions currently needed for qemu but if nobody objects I'd like to > > > > > add them to: > > > > > > > > > > virDomainDeviceDefParse > > > > > virDomainDefParseString > > > > > virDomainHostdevSubsysUsbDefParseXML > > > > > virDomainDiskDefParseXML > > > > > virDomainFSDefParseXML > > > > > virDomainNetDefParseXML > > > > > virDomainInputDefParseXML > > > > > virDomainSoundDefParseXML > > > > > virDomainHostdevDefParseXML > > > > > virDomainChrDefParseXML > > > > > > > Attached patch adds a flag parameter to the above functions and passes > > > VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE from the upper levels. I see two advantages in > > > this: > > > > > > * symmetric interfaces to the XML parsing functions (why has > > > virDomainDefParseFile a flags argument while virDomainDefParseString > > > hasn't) > > > * other drivers can use this very easily (IIRC lxc has some use for it) > > > > > > otherwise there's not too much gain so I'm a bit undecided if this is > > > actually necessary. > > > > ACK > > Sounds fine to me too, Applied now. -- Guido -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list