On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 19:53:13 +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote: > Hi all, > > Any comments about this series? > > I'm not sure whether this series' method to support cpu hotplug in > libvirt is reasonable, so could anyone give more suggestions about this > function? Thanks. Well, as Dan pointed out in his review for this series and previous version, we are not convinced that we need a way to specify the CPU model and other parameters as having dissimilar CPUs doesn't make sense. A solution is either to build the cpu plug on top of the existing API or provide enough information to convince us that having the cpu model in the XML actually makes sense. > > Regards, > Zhu Peter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list