On 22.01.2015 11:53, Peter Krempa wrote:
> ---
> src/util/virbitmap.c | 6 ++++++
> src/util/virbitmap.h | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virbitmap.c b/src/util/virbitmap.c
> index 05c50e4..d5b0035 100644
> --- a/src/util/virbitmap.c
> +++ b/src/util/virbitmap.c
> @@ -504,6 +504,12 @@ bool virBitmapEqual(virBitmapPtr b1, virBitmapPtr b2)
> virBitmapPtr tmp;
> size_t i;
>
> + if (!b1 && !b2)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (!b1 || !b2)
> + return false;
> +
> if (b1->max_bit > b2->max_bit) {
> tmp = b1;
> b1 = b2;
> diff --git a/src/util/virbitmap.h b/src/util/virbitmap.h
> index 565264c..a347f0a 100644
> --- a/src/util/virbitmap.h
> +++ b/src/util/virbitmap.h
> @@ -84,8 +84,7 @@ virBitmapPtr virBitmapNewData(void *data, int len) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1);
> int virBitmapToData(virBitmapPtr bitmap, unsigned char **data, int *dataLen)
> ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(2);
>
> -bool virBitmapEqual(virBitmapPtr b1, virBitmapPtr b2)
> - ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(2);
> +bool virBitmapEqual(virBitmapPtr b1, virBitmapPtr b2);
>
> size_t virBitmapSize(virBitmapPtr bitmap)
> ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1);
>
There are some places in the code that already call this and do the
checks you're introducing. Can we drop the duplicity then?
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list