On 1/15/15 4:37 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/15/2015 03:32 PM, Gary R Hook wrote:
From: Gary R Hook <grhookatwork@xxxxxxxxx>
Do not run ZFS tests when ZFS is unsupported in the environment.
The recent patch b4af40226d09adeaf9e33a1d6594c4e8ce7f771d adds tests
to storagepoolxml2xmltest for the optional ZFS feature. When ZFS is
not included in the configuration these tests should not / cannot be
run. Modify Makefile.am and the test source file to check for use of
the feature and compile in the tests accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/Makefile.am | 4 ++++
tests/storagepoolxml2xmltest.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am
index e9418ea..8f8df27 100644
--- a/tests/Makefile.am
+++ b/tests/Makefile.am
@@ -780,6 +780,10 @@ storagepoolxml2xmltest_SOURCES = \
storagepoolxml2xmltest.c \
testutils.c testutils.h
storagepoolxml2xmltest_LDADD = $(LDADDS)
+storagepoolxml2xmltest_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS)
+if WITH_STORAGE_ZFS
+storagepoolxml2xmltest_CFLAGS += -DWITH_STORAGE_ZFS
+endif
This shouldn't be needed. Our config.h should already be defining all
the appropriate WITH_* feature macros. If it is not, that's a bug in
configure.ac.
I'm not adding a #define. I'm just passing one along to the compiler.
Turning a configure parameter in to a compiler parameter.
If you have a suggestion as to how to #ifdef the source code (below) in
a way that keeps it from being compiled when ZFS isn't in use, I'm all
ears. I thought this was pretty clean.
nodedevxml2xmltest_SOURCES = \
nodedevxml2xmltest.c \
diff --git a/tests/storagepoolxml2xmltest.c b/tests/storagepoolxml2xmltest.c
index 52e2193..270f75d 100644
--- a/tests/storagepoolxml2xmltest.c
+++ b/tests/storagepoolxml2xmltest.c
@@ -106,8 +106,10 @@ mymain(void)
DO_TEST("pool-gluster");
DO_TEST("pool-gluster-sub");
DO_TEST("pool-scsi-type-scsi-host-stable");
+#ifdef WITH_STORAGE_ZFS
DO_TEST("pool-zfs");
DO_TEST("pool-zfs-sourcedev");
+#endif
Why is only this test conditional? Shouldn't other things like gluster
also be conditional, based on whether those features were built into
libvirt?
You have a very good point. I wasn't trying to fix any/all problems,
just the one that bit me, and that is the most recent of this type of
mistake. I might conclude that any older conditional tests haven't been
exposed as problematic, although clearly every test should be properly
vetted against the actual environment.
Really appreciate the quick notice and response, however. Thank you.
--
Gary R Hook
Senior Kernel Engineer
NIMBOXX, Inc
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list