Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 22:03 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > >> The first attempt to implement support for parsing/formatting Xen's >> xl disk config format copied Xen's flex-based parser into libvirt, which >> has proved to be challenging in the context of autotools. But as it turns >> out, Xen provides an interface to the parser via libxlutil. >> >> This series reverts the first attempt, along with subsequent attempts to >> fix it, and replaces it with an implementation based on libxlutil. The >> first nine patches revert the original implementation and subsequent fixes. >> Patch 10 provides an implemenation based on libxlutil. Patches 11 and >> 12 are basically unchanged from patches 3 and 4 in the first attempt. >> >> One upshot of using libxlutil instead of copying the flex source is >> removing the potential for source divergence. >> > > Thanks for doing this, looks good to me, FWIW. > > Is the presence/absence of xen-xl support exposed via virsh anywhere? If > so then I can arrange for my Xen osstest patches for libvirt testing to > use xen-xl when available but still fallback to xen-xm. I've had a look > in "virsh capabilities" and "virsh help domxml-from-native" but not > seeing xen-xm, so assuming xen-xl won't magically appear in any of those > places either. > AFAIK, the only place the supported native formats are listed is in the virsh man page. But thanks for the question, else I would have missed adding xen-xl to the man page in 12/12. Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list