Re: libseccomp and KVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks.


2014-12-12 16:32 GMT+01:00 Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:24:55PM +0100, Raymond Durand wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> How are the rules managed so as to fit the VM system calls?
> Is tuning possible? recommended?

QEMU has a built-in policy that adds rules for every conceivable
function that QEMU might need to execute. Given that is quite
broad, the security benefit from seccomp enablement is quit low
IMHO


I see.
Is it something like each QEMU device enabled comes along with a system-calls list ie. rules allowed?
Is this list of rules loaded at each time the QEMU/KVM starts?

 
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

Regards,
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]