On 12/12/2014 09:02 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > 2014-12-12 18:31 GMT+03:00 Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> Well, while trying to review the patch, it seems like you haven't sent >> rebased version. I mean, Laine pushed a patchset on Dec 8, that reworks >> qemuNetworkIfaceConnect() so that it's called only on a few occasions. >> However, the patch you've sent on Dec 10 doesn't even apply cleanly. I had >> to go to before his patches to be able to apply it cleanly. However, since >> the function semantics has changed since then, can you rebase to the current >> HEAD and resend? Thanks! > > > I'm rebase and resend. Thanks When resending a series, it's better to make a new top-level thread, rather than trying to bury the updated patch in-reply-to an existing deeply-nested thread. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list