On 12/12/14 12:49, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 12/12/2014 04:04 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Liu <cyliu@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> src/remote/remote_driver.c | 2 +-
>> src/remote/remote_protocol.x | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> struct remote_domain_send_process_signal_args {
>> remote_nonnull_domain dom;
>> hyper pid_value;
>> @@ -5550,5 +5555,11 @@ enum remote_procedure {
>> * @generate: none
>> * @acl: domain:fs_freeze
>> */
>> - REMOTE_PROC_DOMAIN_GET_FSINFO = 349
>> + REMOTE_PROC_DOMAIN_GET_FSINFO = 349,
>> +
>> + /**
>> + * @generate: both
>> + * @acl: domain:send_input
>> + */
>
> Just send_input? The result of the send is essentially 'init_control'
> right? Like a shutdown. Perhaps even like destroy (eg, 'stop'). Or
> 'shutdown'... I'm not sure of all the options here, but this seems much
> more invasive than just sending input because the result of the sent key
> is a bit more "final".
Since you are able to do the same thing with the virDomainSendKey API
which has the same ACL class:
virsh send-key dom KEY_LEFTALT KEY_SYSRQ KEY_O
I don't think it should require any other permission since it's just a
keystroke basically.
Peter
>
> John
>> + REMOTE_PROC_DOMAIN_SEND_SYSRQ = 350
>> };
>>
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list