On 12/08/2014 03:32 AM, Yves Vinter wrote: > No answer ??? > > What does it mean : > > - you don't have a window for the review ? Probably truer than we wish - the biggest bottleneck in open source projects is review time. > > - you are not interested in getting these developments ? To the contrary, we ARE interested. It's just a juggling act between fixing known bugs in other areas and taking the mental time to review relatively unfamiliar code. > > - you don't agree with the delivery process I proposed ? > > - you prefer getting the whole set of the v2 versions before reviewing ? At this point, a rebased v2 will probably get reviewed faster than waiting for someone to jump on v1. Also, one of the BEST ways to get your code reviewed faster is to return the favor by reviewing other patches. Even if you admit that your review is weak and you'd like a second set of eyes, any review that you can offer to someone else's patches shows that you are serious about contributing to the community, and therefore deserve the community's time to review your patches. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list