On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:07:39PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On 12/05/14 15:02, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > Currently, when there is an API that's blocking with locked domain and > > second API that's waiting in virDomainObjListFindByUUID() for the domain > > lock (with the domain list locked) no other API can be executed on any > > domain on the whole hypervisor because all would wait for the domain > > list to be locked. This patch adds new optional approach to this in > > which the domain is only ref'd (reference counter is incremented) > > instead of being locked and is locked *after* the list itself is > > unlocked. We might consider only ref'ing the domain in the future and > > leaving locking on particular APIs, but that's no tonight's fairy tale. > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > src/conf/domain_conf.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > src/conf/domain_conf.h | 2 ++ > > src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > ACK, although given that the devel freeze is tomorrow and second patch > of this series is pretty invasive, I think that giving this change a > full dev cycle is a better way to go. Agreed, particularly as this will be a longer dev cycle than usual due to christmas - don't want to risk destablising this release. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list