On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 15:58:45 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:52:25PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > Both qemu-img and its stripped down version qcow-create are searched for > > dynamically with virFindFileInPath, functions using them report errors > > when the required binary is not present, and we don't compile in a fixed > > path detected by configure anymore. So I don't see a reason for keeping > > the dependencies for our storage driver. Moreover, it's weired when the > > dependencies (of the storage driver) change depending on wheter a > > particular hypervisor driver (xen/qemu) is enabled or not. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > libvirt.spec.in | 18 ------------------ > > 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) > > Even if using the Xen hypervisor, you can use the qemu-img binary > for creating volumes. Since the qemu-img binary is in a separate > RPM from the main QEMU emulator binaries, it makes sense to depend > on qemu-img if we're enabling QEMU support in libvirt. Similarly the > LXC driver can make use of qemu-img for creating images that are then > used via qemu-nbd. > > So I think our current Requires deps are actually correct here - they > ensure that the qemu-img binary is always pulled into the host, no > matter what daemon-driver-XXX is installed. But it still feels wrong. A choice of what hypervisor driver is enabled should not influence dependencies of a storage driver. If we want the storage driver to depend on qemu-img, I think the dependency should be enabled by a separate switch, so that one can enable qemu-img support without enabling qemu driver. Or am I just over-engineering it based on my confusion why storage deps change depending on enabled HV drivers? Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list