On 11/12/2014 10:53 AM, Matthias Gatto wrote: > reported here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-November/msg00327.html > > I could have just remove bool supportMaxOptions variable, but > if I had do this, we could not check anymore if the nparams variable is > superior to QEMU_NB_BLOCK_IO_TUNE_PARAM_MAX. > > v2: change following this proposal: > http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-November/msg00379.html > > --- > src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 17 +++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > ACK I'll push the two Coverity changes shortly, plus I'll post the test Jan asked for... John -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list