On 10/15/2014 03:54 PM, Pradipta Kr. Banerjee wrote:
Comment mentions virGetNodeCPUMap whereas the actual method is virNodeGetCPUMap. Similarly comment mentions virGetNodeInfo whereas the actual method is virNodeGetInfo Signed-off-by: Pradipta Kr. Banerjee <bpradip@xxxxxxxxxx> --- libvirt-override.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libvirt-override.c b/libvirt-override.c index 8b3c503..9ba87eb 100644 --- a/libvirt-override.c +++ b/libvirt-override.c @@ -437,10 +437,10 @@ cleanup: /* * Utility function to retrieve the number of node CPUs present. - * It first tries virGetNodeCPUMap, which will return the + * It first tries virNodeGetCPUMap, which will return the * number reliably, if available. * As a fallback and for compatibility with backlevel libvirt - * versions virGetNodeInfo will be called to calculate the + * versions virNodeGetInfo will be called to calculate the * CPU number, which has the potential to return a too small * number if some host CPUs are offline. */
ACK and pushed, thanks for the patch. Pavel -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list