Re: [PATCH 5/5] libxl: Support user-specified <emulator>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19.09.2014 21:23, Jim Fehlig wrote:
With the introduction of the libxlDomainGetEmulatorType function,
it is trivial to support a user-specfied <emulator> in the libxl
driver.  This patch is based loosely on David Scott's old patch
to do the same

https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-April/msg02119.html

Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx>
---
  src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/libxl/libxl_conf.c b/src/libxl/libxl_conf.c
index 09211f8..882dcff 100644
--- a/src/libxl/libxl_conf.c
+++ b/src/libxl/libxl_conf.c
@@ -705,6 +705,21 @@ libxlMakeDomBuildInfo(virDomainDefPtr def,
          if (VIR_STRDUP(b_info->u.hvm.boot, bootorder) < 0)
              goto error;

+        if (def->emulator) {
+            if (!virFileExists(def->emulator)) {
+                virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
+                               _("emulator '%s' not found"),
+                               def->emulator);
+                goto error;
+            }
+
+            VIR_FREE(b_info->device_model);
+            if (VIR_STRDUP(b_info->device_model, def->emulator) < 0)
+                goto error;
+
+            b_info->device_model_version = libxlDomainGetEmulatorType(def);
+        }
+
          if (def->nserials) {
              if (def->nserials > 1) {
                  virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,


Do we need virFileIsExecutable too?

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]