Just realized that this is probably more suited for the users mailing
list. Please disregard, I'll move it there.
On Fri 12 Sep 2014 03:00:06 PM EDT, Michael Turek wrote:
Hello all,
I was recently trying out NUMA placement for my guests on both x86_64
and ppc64 machines. When booting a guest on the x86_64 machine, the
following specs were valid (obviously, just notable excepts from the xml):
<memory unit='KiB'>8388608</memory>
<currentMemory unit='KiB'>8388608</currentMemory>
<vcpu placement='static'>4</vcpu>
...
<cpu>
<topology sockets='4' cores='1' threads='1'/>
<numa>
<cell cpus='0-2' memory='6144'/>
<cell cpus='3' memory='2048'/>
</numa>
</cpu>
However, on ppc64 this causes the following error:
error: Failed to create domain from sample_guest.xml
error: internal error: early end of file from monitor: possible problem:
2014-09-11T18:44:25.502140Z qemu-system-ppc64: total memory for NUMA
nodes (8388608) should equal RAM size (200000000)
The 200000000 is actually 8192 MB in bytes and hexidecimal. This is
apparently just an issue with the error message.
The following specs work on ppc64:
<cpu>
<topology sockets='4' cores='1' threads='1'/>
<numa>
<cell cpus='0-2' memory='6291456'/>
<cell cpus='3' memory='2097152'/>
</numa>
</cpu>
Note that the memory for each cell is 6144*1024 and 2048*1024
respectively. The issue is that the memory size for each NUMA cell
should be specified in KiB, not MB
(http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#resPartition "|memory| specifies
the node memory in kibibyte").
In short, it seems that specifying NUMA cell memory in MB works on
x86_64 but not on ppc64. Does anyone have any insight to what's
causing this, or if I'm misunderstanding something? Any help is
appreciated, thank you!
Regards,
Mike Turek
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list