[PATCH v1 02/10] locking: Implement seclabel stubs for NOP

[Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The NOP drivers needs implementation, although the function
bodies are empty. This is because the virLockManager APIs check
for driver implementation and returns an error if there's none.

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 src/locking/lock_driver_nop.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/locking/lock_driver_nop.c b/src/locking/lock_driver_nop.c
index 93a988e..edb450b 100644
--- a/src/locking/lock_driver_nop.c
+++ b/src/locking/lock_driver_nop.c
@@ -101,6 +101,25 @@ static void virLockManagerNopFree(virLockManagerPtr lock ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
 {
 }
 
+static int
+virLockManagerNopRememberSeclabel(virLockManagerPtr lock ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+                                  const char *path ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+                                  const char *model ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+                                  const char *seclabel ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+    return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+virLockManagerNopRecallSeclabel(virLockManagerPtr lock ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+                                const char *path ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+                                const char *model ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+                                char **seclabel ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+    /* A positive return value means no seclabel restoring. */
+    return 1;
+}
+
 virLockDriver virLockDriverNop =
 {
     .version = VIR_LOCK_MANAGER_VERSION,
@@ -118,4 +137,7 @@ virLockDriver virLockDriverNop =
     .drvRelease = virLockManagerNopRelease,
 
     .drvInquire = virLockManagerNopInquire,
+
+    .drvRemember = virLockManagerNopRememberSeclabel,
+    .drvRecall = virLockManagerNopRecallSeclabel,
 };
-- 
1.8.5.5

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list