Re: [PATCH] blockjob: avoid 32-bit compilation warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/08/14 17:43, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/08/2014 08:55 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> 
>> Forcing the left side of the < to be ull instead of ul shuts up
>> the 32-bit compiler while still protecting 64-bit code from overflow.
> 
>>                   * ullong bytes/s; make sure we don't overflow */
>> -                if (bandwidth > ULLONG_MAX >> 20) {
>> +                if (bandwidth + 0ULL > ULLONG_MAX >> 20) {
> 
> On IRC, several people suggested that I write this with an explicit cast:
> 
> if ((unsigned long long) bandwidth > ULLONG_MAX >> 20) {
> 
> rather than my shorthand of an identity operation used to coerce types
> via promotion rules.  If you feel strongly in favor of one of the two
> approaches, or strongly about avoiding needless churn now that the patch
> is already pushed, speak up now; if not, I'll probably make the change
> to use an explicit cast later today.
>
I don't think it's worth fixing up since it's pushed already.

Peter


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]