On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:08:37PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > Hi, > > This is a follow-up to the RFC patch sent by Chris Wright, at: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-November/msg00225.html > > With this patch, instead of hardcoding the MTU to an high value, we set > the MTU of the tap interface to the same MTU value set on the bridge > interface. The current code uses the default tap MTU value and lowers > the bridge interface MTU without any need, killing performance. ACK, this looks like a reasonable approach to - the initial physical NIC attached to the bridge will set the preferred MTU, so we're just following that now. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list