On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 02:14:10PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 02:08:51PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > >v3 is here: > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-July/msg01185.html > > > >the bug I'm still trying to fix is here: > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927369 > > > > I forgot to mention that only patches 4, 8 and probably 9 need to be > ACKed since v3. FWIW, I consider it better to just push the previously ACKd patches if they don't depend on an un-ACKd patch, to save reviewer time. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list