On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:00:26AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/19/2014 10:57 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > rtc-reset-reinjection has been introduced because certain Windows > > versions will advance the guest system time (via rtc interrupt > > reinjection). > > > > So if libvirt adjusts the guest system time via guest-set-time, > > allowing rtc interrupt reinjection to compensate for lost time, > > as well, will cause an incorrect guest system time. > > > > So you should always use the > > > > guest-set-time > > rtc-reset-reinjection > > > > pair. > > But is that true both for the 'guest-set-time' no-arg case (which tells > the guest to read the current RTC and update in-memory time > accordingly), as well as the 'guest-set-time with time argument' case > (which tells the guest to forcefully set in-memory time, then write that > time back to the RTC)? Yes. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list