Err, maybe a patch that actually compiles would be useful ..
Jim
Jim Fehlig wrote:
> As discussed in [1], prefer xend interface for setting max memory.
>
> Regards,
> Jim
>
> [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-November/msg00339.html
>
Index: libvirt-0.4.6/src/xen_unified.c
===================================================================
--- libvirt-0.4.6.orig/src/xen_unified.c
+++ libvirt-0.4.6/src/xen_unified.c
@@ -799,8 +799,15 @@ xenUnifiedDomainSetMaxMemory (virDomainP
GET_PRIVATE(dom->conn);
int i;
+ /* Prefer xend for setting max memory */
+ if (priv->opened[XEN_UNIFIED_XEND_OFFSET]) {
+ if (xenDaemonDomainSetMaxMemory (dom, memory) == 0)
+ return 0;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < XEN_UNIFIED_NR_DRIVERS; ++i)
- if (priv->opened[i] &&
+ if (i != XEN_UNIFIED_XEND_OFFSET &&
+ priv->opened[i] &&
drivers[i]->domainSetMaxMemory &&
drivers[i]->domainSetMaxMemory (dom, memory) == 0)
return 0;
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list