On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 09:55:31AM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: > While sarting to build the RPMs for Fedora I noticed that there > were a couple of cleanup patches missing about the handling of > configuration files, and we forgot to add the dependancy on > hal/hal-devel. We should also probably list hal and devkit support > as modular options in the spec too. But this patch is just to > harmonize with Fedora, ACK I think its fine keeping HAL as mandatory for now - its pretty much a mandatory part of any Fedora install these days. DevKit can be ignored until it becomes more useful Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list