On 07/24/2014 02:03 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > This reflects the same change made in kernel commit df457f845e (before > v2.6.38-rc7). On the rare occasion when the user would try setting > the weight to value in range <10, 100) on older kernel, we will error > out with EINVAL properly. Modifying the error message (adding a hint > for example) would cause weird logs, especially without stacked error > messages (I couldn't resist mentioning it again). > > There is no (easy) way of getting the limits from kernel, since it's > not exposed. I think removing the limit checks from libvirt, as was done for ranges specified via XML, would be a nicer fix: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-October/msg00525.html Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list