On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 09:12:31 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/17/2014 08:22 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > Decisions whether qemu driver and libvirt-daemon-{qemu,kvm} packages
> > should be built on various OS/arch combinations were scattered around
> > the spec file. Let's make it easier to see where qemu driver is going to
> > be built.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > libvirt.spec.in | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
> > index 9c7b241..472fa4b 100644
> > --- a/libvirt.spec.in
> > +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
> > @@ -54,15 +54,27 @@
> > %define with_vbox 0%{!?_without_vbox:%{server_drivers}}
> >
> > %define with_qemu_tcg %{with_qemu}
> > -# Change if we ever provide qemu-kvm binaries on non-x86 hosts
> > -%if 0%{?fedora} >= 18
> > +
> > +%define qemu_kvm_arches %{ix86} x86_64
> > +
> > +%if 0%{?fedora}
> > + %if 0%{?fedora} < 16
> > + # Fedora doesn't have any QEMU on ppc64 until FC16 - only ppc
> > + %ifarch ppc64
> > + %define with_qemu_tcg 0
> > + %endif
> > + %endif
>
> This may be removed if we come to a conclusion in the other thread about
> how much we want to support older Fedora. But we can clean it up later,
> this patch is just moving it.
>
> ACK.
Pushed, thanks.
Jirka
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list