On 07/16/2014 05:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> But if I then rework the iohelper patch:
>
> diff --git i/src/util/iohelper.c w/src/util/iohelper.c
> index 8a3c377..efb1366 100644
> --- i/src/util/iohelper.c
> +++ w/src/util/iohelper.c
> @@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
>
> + fprintf(stderr, _("goodbye world\n")); goto error;
> if (fd < 0 || runIO(path, fd, oflags, length) < 0)
> goto error;
>
>
> the error is now:
>
> error: Failed to save domain testvm1 to /tmp/save
> error: operation failed: domain save job: unexpectedly failed
and with your patch, I see:
error: Failed to save domain testvm1 to /tmp/save
error: internal error: Child process (LIBVIRT_LOG_OUTPUTS=1:stderr
/home/eblake/libvirt/src/libvirt_iohelper /tmp/save 0 1) unexpected exit
status 1: goodbye world
/home/eblake/libvirt/src/libvirt_iohelper: unknown failure with /tmp/save
on the console, but this longer spew in libvirt's log:
2014-07-16 23:34:23.855+0000: 25406: error :
qemuMigrationUpdateJobStatus:1788 : operation failed: domain save job:
unexpectedly failed
2014-07-16 23:34:23.857+0000: 25406: error : virCommandWait:2423 :
internal error: Child process (LIBVIRT_LOG_OUTPUTS=1:stderr
/home/eblake/libvirt/src/libvirt_iohelper /tmp/save 0 1) unexpected exit
status 1: goodbye world
/home/eblake/libvirt/src/libvirt_iohelper: unknown failure with /tmp/save
2014-07-16 23:34:23.857+0000: 25406: warning : virFileWrapperFdClose:326
: iohelper reports: goodbye world
/home/eblake/libvirt/src/libvirt_iohelper: unknown failure with /tmp/save
so the act of closing the wrapperfd is losing the earlier error message
from being reported to the user (seems okay in this case, but might not
always be), AND logging the stderr contents twice (once via the error
reported to the user, and again due to a VIR_WARN).
>
> So the problem is that we have _two_ possible sources of errors (qemu
> reporting failure because it can't write to iohelper, and iohelper
> reporting an error from whatever other reason, such as disk full). If
> qemu finishes, we have only the iohelper message and properly report it;
> but if we have both failures, then the qemu error takes priority, and in
> this case it is lower priority. There are also cases where qemu will
> error out but iohelper succeeds (such as if qemu refuses to migrate
> because the guest has hostdev passthrough).
>
> So I _think_ what we want to do is always check BOTH places for error;
> if only one of the two fails, use that message. If both fail, then I
> don't know whether it is possible to have a heuristic for which failure
> message is more meaningful, or whether it is better to report both
> errors (even though it will often be the case that one error was a
> knock-on effect from the other). But I'm a bit stuck on the best way to
> implement that.
I'm still thinking about the best solution
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list