Re: Enable kvm on aarch64, Cleanup F-16/18 conditionals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:14:54AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> reposting to the upstream list - we'd like to keep the downstream .spec
> file in sync with upstream, rather than needlessly diverging.
> 
> On 07/15/2014 10:52 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > commit ae37ed3500672f12383825c84dd5ae940fb90ff8
> > Author: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Tue Jul 15 17:52:18 2014 +0100
> > 
> >     Enable kvm on aarch64, Cleanup F-16/18 conditionals
> > 
> >  libvirt.spec |   28 ++++++++--------------------
> >  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > diff --git a/libvirt.spec b/libvirt.spec
> > index fad21d9..213760d 100644
> > --- a/libvirt.spec
> > +++ b/libvirt.spec
> > @@ -55,14 +55,10 @@
> >  
> >  %define with_qemu_tcg      %{with_qemu}
> >  # Change if we ever provide qemu-kvm binaries on non-x86 hosts
> > -%if 0%{?fedora} >= 18
> > -    %if 0%{?fedora} >= 20
> > -        %define qemu_kvm_arches    %{ix86} x86_64 ppc64 s390x %{arm}
> > -    %else
> > -        %define qemu_kvm_arches    %{ix86} x86_64 ppc64 s390x
> > -    %endif
> > +%if 0%{?fedora} >= 20
> > +    %define qemu_kvm_arches    %{ix86} x86_64 %{power64} s390x %{arm} aarch64
> >  %else
> > -    %define qemu_kvm_arches    %{ix86} x86_64
> > +    %define qemu_kvm_arches    %{ix86} x86_64 %{power64} s390x
> >  %endif
> >  %ifarch %{qemu_kvm_arches}
> > @@ -212,18 +208,6 @@
> >      %define with_xen 0
> >  %endif
> >  
> > -# Fedora doesn't have any QEMU on ppc64 until FC16 - only ppc
> > -%if 0%{?fedora} && 0%{?fedora} < 16
> > -    %ifarch ppc64
> > -        %define with_qemu 0
> > -    %endif
> > -%endif
> > -
> > -# Fedora doesn't have new enough Xen for libxl until F18
> > -%if 0%{?fedora} && 0%{?fedora} < 18
> > -    %define with_libxl 0
> > -%endif
> > -

Historically we've kept support for building libvirt against
Fedora versions even if unsupported by Fedora itself, because
we've found people often stick on old Fedora versions. At some
point though it does get a bit insane. eg we don't really need
Fedora 8 support at this point. If we are going todo a cleanup
though, we should do it throughout the spec, not just in these
few places


> >  # PolicyKit was introduced in Fedora 8 / RHEL-6 or newer
> >  %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 || 0%{?rhel} >= 6
> >      %define with_polkit    0%{!?_without_polkit:1}
> > @@ -385,7 +369,7 @@
> >  Summary: Library providing a simple virtualization API
> >  Name: libvirt
> >  Version: 1.2.6
> > -Release: 1%{?dist}%{?extra_release}
> > +Release: 2%{?dist}%{?extra_release}
> >  License: LGPLv2+
> >  Group: Development/Libraries
> >  BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
> > @@ -2236,6 +2220,10 @@ exit 0
> >  %doc examples/systemtap

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]