On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 18:33 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 01:28:23PM -0500, David Lively wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 16:49 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:41:43AM -0500, David Lively wrote: > > > > While starting to think about Windows compability, I realized the newly > > > > exposed API for registering an external EventImpl is not adequate. > > > > Currently it's assuming 32-bit unix fds. But Windows uses a pointer > > > > (HANDLE) here. So we need to generalize this interface so it can be > > > > implemented for 64-bit Windows. The attached patch does this. (I'm > > > > sure it conflicts with work Dan B is doing, so I'm hoping he'll just > > > > incorporate this into his changes.) > > > > > > I'm not sure whether this is actually required. We're using gnulib for > > > socket stuff, and that wraps the Winsock socket() call so that it returns > > > a real file descriptor rather than a socket handle. It does this calling > > > _open_osfhandle which appears to be declared to accept a 'long' and return > > > an 'int' - at least in MinGW headers. > > > > That means that the Windows application using libvirt must use gnulib as > > well. If the Windows version of libvirt actually exports the gnulib > > bindings and headers, then I guess that's not a problem. But does it > > export gnulib? > > No, the gnulib stuff is internal only - we don't force any apps to also > use gnulib. > > It does however mean we should document that the 'fd' arg of the > the virEventAddHandle callback is an file handle, and not a socket > handle on Win32, so apps are clear on what to expect. Does Windows support integer file handles? Or are they a winsock concept - in which case we're assuming the app uses winsock, right? [Sorry - I'm not trying to be thick -- I'm not a Windows guy at all. But I have hazy memories of winsock not being "standard" WIN32 ...] Dave -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list