Daniel P. Berrange wrote on 11/04/2008 04:42 PM: > Then there is XenAPI in Xen >= 3.1.0. We don't currently use XenAPI > at all, and I'm not up2date on its level of functionality, but in > the original scope it was intended to provide full event notification > capabilities for VMs. If the XenAPI event stuff was ever implemented, > then perhaps we should make use of that, and say older non-XenAPI > versions only get a limited sub-set of our events ? ugh. I tried using xenapi about 8 months ago... Back then - it was messy, and underdocumented, IMO - and a large reason why started to look at libvirt in the first place. It seemed...shoe-horned into an existing scheme, with a new API. There was some effort a little while back to shore this up...but I don't know where, or if that really went anywhere. I think it would be a mistake to integrate that project into this one. -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list