"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:21:25PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: >> From: Jim Meyering <meyering@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Now, sys/socket.h is always available, and errno works. > > With the removal of errno stuff and santization of headers > I don't see all that much point in keeping socketcompat.h > around at all - can't we just include the right things in > the right places Yes, of course. Actually, an earlier version did remove socketcompat.h, but that change was more invasive. So how about if I remove socketcompat.h once these changes are committed? -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list