On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:34:05PM -0700, Ian Main wrote: > On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:56:21 +0200 > Daniel Veillard <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:55:36AM -0700, Ian Main wrote: > > I'm a little bit worried by the following: > > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > > 9758 qpidd 20 0 273m 137m 1644 S 46.6 6.8 986:30.29 qpidd > > > > that's with just 3 nodes over a week with no traffic except the > > keeping the machines on the bus, the memory footprint of qpidd > > seems to be growing, very slowly but nonetheless continuously, and > > that's just with 3 nodes hooked with libvirt-qpid. > > is that a genuine leak in qpidd ? (qpidd-0.3.700546-1.fc9.x86_64) > > is that related to the policy to keep messages sent to the QPid bus ? > > > > I wonder. It also consumes some non-neglective amount of CPU as > > a background task. > > I talked to the qpid folks about this today. It's a bug one way or another. > They fixed one that may be causing this and there will be new RPMs out > hopefully today. If that doesn't do it it may have something to do with > how QMF is doing things. If you still see this after the RPM upgrade > let me know. I'll be trying it out too. Thanks! Okay, I will keep an eye, thanks for the info ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list