On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:23:05PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> Calling virDiskNameToIndex with a disk name > {sd,hd,xvd,vd}z, such as
> vdaa, generates a bogus index. Account for iterations through the loop.
>
> Old behaviour:
> vda -> 0
> vdz -> 25
> vdaa -> 0
> vdaz -> 25
>
> New behaviour:
> vda -> 0
> vdz -> 25
> vdaa -> 26
> vdaz -> 51
>
> This was discovered by Sanjay Rao, thanks for the report.
ACK.
Good to know someone's testing scalability with > 26 disks :-)
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list