Chris Wright wrote:
* Anthony Liguori (anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
This is the bit I really don't buy - we're equating qemu caching to IDE
write-back caching and saying the risk of corruption is the same in both
cases.
Yes.
I'm with Mark here.
I've been persuaded. Relying on the host's integrity for guest data
integrity is not a good idea by default. I don't think we should use
cache=off to address this though. I've sent a patch and started a
thread on qemu-devel. Let's continue the conversation there.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list