Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3 of 3] Add cpu_shares support to virsh schedinfo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



DB> Not your fault, but this schedinfo command is a really dumb wrt to
DB> option handling. Requiring that we add new options for every
DB> possible schedular param for every possible hypervisor is just
DB> crazy.

Agreed.  I actually just wrote this patch for my own testing, but
decided to send it out as part of the rest anyway.

DB> it should use
DB>     schedinfo --set weight=10

Agreed :)

DB> so it automatically has support for every parameter supported by
DB> the hypervisor in question. It can validate that the user suplied
DB> param name is correct by calling 'virDomainGetSchedularParams' to
DB> see what are available.

I can do that, but since the CIM providers don't depend on virsh for
this, can we move forward with the first two patches before we get
this fixed up?

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpUD54JQAZBC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]