On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:34:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:20:54AM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote: > > New patch below, with changes discussed (removal of --without devel) > > That patch underwent some line wrapping when you put it into the mail. > It's much better to send patches as attachments. Here is the I'm fine with inline patches, provided they're sent from a mail client which doesn't mangle whitespace. This doc has details on how to make Thunderbird not suck. http://lwn.net/Articles/249669/ Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list