On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:55:26PM +0100, Henri Cook wrote: > A good news - sorry I wasn't aware of the current stance on arbitrary > parameters and can say I completely agree with it. > > Scheduler Parameters API sounds interesting - i'll see if I can find > time to look into it - if there's anyone who already knows how it works > that sees this as a quick patch though, massive points http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainSetSchedulerParameters http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virSchedParameter http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainGetSchedulerParameters it's not fantastic, it's a free form API, you need to be consistent in the name and type of parameters returned by Get and allow a subset to be modified by Set. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list