On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:24:51AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:10:17PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > >> There is unfortunately a pretty prevalent > >> segfault in the latest libvirt. If a qemu > >> domain is defined without an emulator > >> specified, libvirtd crashes. > >> > >> This is doubly unfortunate since current > >> virtinst generates an emulator-less config > >> for all qemu and kvm guests (I'm about to fix > >> this upstream though). > > > > #%(*&#@(%@. Damn. This is worthy of a brown paper bag release for libvirt > > to fix this shockingly bad bug. > > > > If we are going to do this I'd really like to get the > 2 pending max vcpu patches committed, since it's a > big issue that we largely disallow smp kvm guests > at this moment. Do you need more reviews ? I didn't realized we had pending unapplied patches ... Repost if necessary, thanks ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list