On 9/8/08 12:17 AM, "Daniel Veillard" <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:43:41AM -0700, Yushu Yao wrote: >> Thanks Daniel, >> >>> Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a more >>> complex issue but probably not much more complex than existing linux >>> hypervisor support. >> Why is this more complex? Could you please explain a bit more? > > Because that's code which would have to be designed/ported, instead of > just recompiling completely generic code which has already been ported > to Windows. > >> By the way, with libvirt, can I control a hypervisor without the libvirtd >> running with root privilege (or even without libvirtd running at all?)? > > You should not assume this is possible. Just curious, why there is an option "--without-libvirtd" in configure? (Which actually works and make will not produce libvirtd.exe) Many many thanks for your help! -Yushu > > Daniel -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list