Thanks Daniel, > Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a more > complex issue but probably not much more complex than existing linux > hypervisor support. Why is this more complex? Could you please explain a bit more? By the way, with libvirt, can I control a hypervisor without the libvirtd running with root privilege (or even without libvirtd running at all?)? Thanks. -Yushu On 9/5/08 11:27 AM, "Daniel Veillard" <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:19:47AM -0700, Yushu Yao wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Just wondering has anyone successfully ported libvirt to Mac yet? >> >> If yes, could you give some instructions. If not, is there any plans? > > Well there is porting, which means just being able to compile it > without any hypervisor support allowing to do remote access (like for > the current Windows port) and that should not be too hard on MacOS-X > due to its UNIX lineage. > Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a more > complex issue but probably not much more complex than existing linux > hypervisor support. > > In any case, portability patches are welcome ! > > Daniel -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list