Re: [libvirt] libvirt vs XenAPI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Atif

If you want to natively use Xen API,
I will recommend to use it directly.
If you want to use archtecture neutral API,
You should use libvirt.


Libvirt pros and cons
pros:any Xen version is supported (like 3.y.z or 2.y)
cons:architecuture neutral API. specific functionality is not always supported.

And this list may be helpful.
http://libvirt.org/hvsupport.html

Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI


"atif bajwa" <atifbajwa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I am looking to integrate the Xen Management. Please guide me advantages of
> using libvirt over XenAPI and please list xen-based-hypervisor
> distributions(versions) that will be supported with libvirt. And what is
> future of libvirt as XenSource is more focused on XenAPI.
> 
> Regards,
> Atif


--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]