On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:17:50PM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote: > Would a patch adding API calls to > - return the XML description of a saved host, given the name > - restore a saved host with a different description > be considered welcome? As I understand it, yes & yes. > I presume that to maintain backwards compatibility, the latter would be > expected to be exposed to clients via a new call, rather than adding a > parameter to virDomainRestore(); in communicating with the drivers, on > the other hand, my first instinct would be to add an extra parameter to > virDrvDomainRestore. Yes, you cannot change the public API in a non-compatible way. So adding a new API call is the only option as I understand it. You can change internal interfaces as much as you want. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/ Fedora now supports 64 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list