On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 22:01 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > While I can see why it is useful to gather these entries logically, it's not > > very optimised for the parser. Eventually, all this will be compiled into a > > huge regexp, so it's more efficient to regroup entries by type and feed the > > functions with regexps instead of strings, like > > Is performance really that much of a problem ? The libvirt config file > only has 20 or so different settings, and while we'll add more I can't > see it getting very much larger. Changing these settings is also not > something that would be done on a frequent basis / performance critical > path. I find it more readable to group them by functional area unless > there is a serious real world performance issue. We've seen some cases where it made a _dramatic_ difference. But if it's fast enough now, I wouldn't worry about it - just keep that in mind when either running augparse or augtool on it becomes unbearably slow. David -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list