On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:07:32PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > I invoked virt-isntall with --network=bridge:eth1 > rather than --network=bridge:br1 and got the latter > (current) diagnostic below. This change makes it so > in this relatively common case people get a slightly > more understandable diagnostic. ACK. I've seen this original error report from various people and never realized what it was caused by until today. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list