DL> Honestly, these cases are not frequent but they exists. IMO, it is DL> up to me to warn you when there are some corner cases like DL> these. And it is up to you to consider you can ignore them because DL> that happens only when we reach some limits. Fair enough :) DL> It is a good point. But I added this kthread because I needed a DL> separate workq to cleanup the namespace, without this kthread the DL> network namespace can not work properly. IMO, it will not be DL> removed very soon :) I'm not saying that will be, but it's a side effect of your implementation, which may or may not be present in a subsequent revision. DL> But again, you can ignore that, if you prefer to use the 'ip' DL> command. When it really comes down to it, it doesn't matter if the kernel support is present if the user doesn't have an updated 'ip' binary. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpfCGfqV7iCP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list