On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:51:43AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:25:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > The docs are wrong. Destory merely hard-kills the object being managed. > > It does not free memory associated with the object. > > No, the documentation says it frees the objects (and has done > forever), so it should free them. I have code which depends on this > behaviour. It depends on behaviour which does *not* exist so is already broken. With inactive domains free'ing the object after destroy is non-sensical because the domain still exists, merely in the shutoff state. Dan. -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list