Daniel Veillard <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:51:08AM -0700, Dave Leskovec wrote: > Sounds fine in principle but i have a couple of questions with the patch > >> +#include <stdbool.h> > > err ... what is that ? looks like a linux specific header, do we really > need this ? epoll is linux specific I think but #include <sys/epoll.h> > should be sufficient no ? <stdbool.h> is not Linux specific. It's the C99-specified header that provides e.g,. the "bool" type. Good C code has been able to use the "bool" type portably (at least through autoconf/gnulib-provided insulation) for many years. These days you rarely need the compatibility shims, since nearly everyone has a c99-compliant compiler. -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list