On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 07:24:42PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, the above no longer applies, due to upstream (gnulib)
>>> changes to deal with non-srcdir (aka VPATH) builds. I updated
>>> libvirt from gnulib just yesterday, and will again, later today.
>>> Can you adapt your patch to make bzr work with the newer version?
>> I'll do it when you're done updating gnulib.
> I'm done for now, and pulled the new version into libvirt.
Ok, I'll fix up the patch later tonight.
>> Well, if anyone insists on not changing something that only works
>> with bash to something that works with any shell (${*:-*} vs.
>> ${*-*}) , but also refuses to put /bin/bash explicitly as the
>> interpreter is just being pointlessly difficult, IMO.
> Um... maybe you didn't notice that I removed the problematic syntax
> altogether?
Sure. I'm just pointing out that if *someone* were to insist that this
is "an Ubuntu problem, because we don't use the same /bin/sh as most
other distros", I'd be rather annoyed.
> >> Here's the patch I've pushed to gnulib:
> >>
> >> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=173a9f0c48a16c3507f8
> >
> > That patch will make the cvs case fail, too. It will prepend a ./ to all
> > path names which will screw with the comparison, AFAICS.
> It handled one case. The two subsequent patches addressed the others.
Oh, ok. Sorry. I thought they would adress different things. I can't see
them in that git tree, I think?
--
Soren Hansen |
Virtualisation specialist | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd. | http://www.ubuntu.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list