On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 20:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > I've just hacked up a similar approach to the one DBus uses to fail > the 'nth' malloc Does that fail exactly the nth malloc or the nth malloc and after (or from nth malloc to (n+k)th malloc) ? The latter two are more realistic for an OOM scenario, and make sure you don't blow up in some error handling routine. > and run the 'xmconfigtest' test case for every 'n' > between 1 and 200 and OOM handling worked correctly in every case. Excellent. David -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list