On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hey, > First thing - libvirt.spec has previously matched the spec file we've > used in Fedora for building packages, but now it's quite a bit out of > sync. > > My question is whether libvirt.spec should be upstream at all: > > 1) Having the two copies is confusing - which is canonical? > > 2) Keeping the two copies in sync is time consuming, especially if > they're not going to be exactly identical. > > 3) It's not clear that it's useful to have it upstream at all - i.e. > is it useful anywhere but Fedora? Are iscsi-initiator-utils or > selinux-devel valid RPM names on any other distro? We also use in the nightly builds Dan. -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list