On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 07:00:48PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Anything further I can do to help get this patch commited? > > > > I have been running with it, without problems across restarts, etc., for > > a couple of weeks now. > I still don't see where the routing rules are defined / take place > with this setup. There must be rules somewhere specifying the routing > for the subnet 78.47.YYY.YYY/30, but its not being done in your > patchset AFAICT I'm not sure what you mean? The host has an interface in the 78.46.xxx.yyy subnet, so there's automatically a route for the subnet set up on the host. Any further routing setup is out of scope, IMO. -- Soren Hansen | Virtualisation specialist | Ubuntu Server Team Canonical Ltd. | http://www.ubuntu.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list